Sussex Scene

An online Red Light District for Brighton & Hove, East and West Sussex
It is currently Tue Dec 12, 2017 6:28 am


All times are UK Punting Time


Forum Guidelines


If you have had a bad punting or escorting experience you are encouraged to post the details in this forum to warn others. However, for legal reasons, please avoid posting full addresses and real names. Telephone numbers may be published in full only if they are already in the public domain, i.e. used in advertisements and internet profiles. If you wish to remain anonymous you may submit one of our Rip Off Report Forms and the warning will then be posted by a site administrator. Here is a link to the bad experience report form, http://www.sussexscene.com/rorf.html



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 96 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 2:33 pm 
due to increased volume of punters contacting me wanting bareback( could it be due to romanian influx?),my answer to them remains none too kind,but I have decided to exercise some measures and will speak to oasis project as well,that they include numbers,at least end digits or adultwork names of punters that pester girls with bareback on their dodgy punter list that gets distributed to parlours and escorts tha advertise in friday ad We need to name and shame and most importantly stay safe. so here goes couple first ones!
****3309599 contacted via friday ad
TomSmith007 contacted via adultwork ,feel free to ad and share or inbox me for full number of the first one!
remember girls,if you're a verified member on adultwork,you can now leave publicly accessible CLIENT NOTES for escorts to leave next to offenders profile name, for other escorts to see. anyone that offers me bareback sex,I mark them as 'red'- meaning dangerous and also leave a note that they offer bareback for girls to read. we need to erradicate or at least try and tackle this problem. stay safe girls x


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 2:47 pm 
I would actually plead admin to change the sections name to ' WORKING GIRLS AND PUNTERS in sussex offering unprotected sex'


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 2:51 pm 
Masseuse
Masseuse
User avatar

Joined: 03 Mar 2011
Posts: 708
Images: 3
Location: West Sussex
Tel No: 07510 698761
It's certainly starting to become a problem! It was rare that I would be asked for it and I think prior to approx 8 months ago I had only ever had one person ask. I've not had anyone from AW ask me, however the Friday-ad lots when I had my last ad up so I'm having a mini break from advertising via that medium.

Will message you for the full number, thanks honey XXX

_________________
Helen Ryder, sensual OR alternate massage (ITEC Diplomas) with comfy lie down couch & seated onsite chair, VERY Experienced Dominatrix with fully equipped playroom

11/06/2016 Only contact me via my phone or my email from my own website thank you. I will only be logging in here to update my field reports or write a short blog. https://www.adultwork.com/1248241
http://www.mistress-helen-ryder.co.uk/ https://twitter.com/helenryder7
http://mistressreview.com/Mistress-Revi ... 54804.html

NO TEXTS replied to, WITHHELD CALLS rejected. By appointment (same day may be possible) ALL new clients to pay a small non returnable deposit 24 hours in advance.


Top
 Profile Personal album  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 3:05 pm 
annabelledelight wrote:
It's certainly starting to become a problem! It was rare that I would be asked for it and I think prior to approx 8 months ago I had only ever had one person ask. I've not had anyone from AW ask me, however the Friday-ad lots when I had my last ad up so I'm having a mini break from advertising via that medium.

Will message you for the full number, thanks honey XXX

yes it's not so common through adultwork,as from friday ad,but even if he doesnt e-mail you about bareback,so not to leave,written evidence,he might use his 'punting phone' for both ,adultwork and friday ad,so it is useful to share between escorts and of course on sussexscene board as I cannot physicaly contact every single escort,helps to weed out the rotten eggs/knobs excuse the pun


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 3:13 pm 
Platinum Member
Platinum Member

Joined: 07 Feb 2013
Posts: 851
Well said ladies. I genuinely wish you well.
Bareback/unprotected sex is a danger to us all.
The more these people get named and shamed the better.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 3:14 pm 
before you would get such an enquiree maybe once in couple months,but 3x in one week is alarming,and the week hasnt ended yet. I spend 100 pounds a week on my friday ad ,some escorts spend less,some more,they are entitled to know,and due to huge volume of calls when using this sort of media they should have facility to be able to access those numbers so that they can store them in their phone as Bareback123.. ,to add them to automated reject list alongside timewaisters and other dodgy punters. making this topic sticky would help,and maybe another poll is due-for escorts to vote. admin?


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 3:44 pm 
'rotty' from adultwork has left feedback for some escort he's booked ,describing indulging in creampie-so barebacker punter- avoid! suitable nickname he's chosen,perhaps his dick is rotting off now
also on the list from same escort
'mageminge' - admits she provided bb to him


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 3:48 pm 
Platinum Member
Platinum Member

Joined: 07 Feb 2013
Posts: 851
keirahunterxx wrote:
'rotty' from adultwork has left feedback for some escort he's booked ,describing indulging in creampie-so barebacker punter- avoid! suitable nickname he's chosen,perhaps his dick is rotting off now


Very nasty (Rotty, not you of course)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 6:20 pm 
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: 03 Jan 2014
Posts: 211
Good for you Keira,
Well past time for the "other half" of the bareback scene to get outed. Only hope it catches on with more escorts. Safer for you and safer for us punters as well. I have to say the marked increase in BB being offered (by demand from punters I would guess) has dampened down my desire to punt. People free to take what ever risks they want, but I want the option to stay as far away from them as possible. Good to see someone prepared to take a stand, and do what is right by herself and her customers-Nicely done Miss Hunter.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 10:39 pm 
Platinum Elite Member
Platinum Elite Member

Joined: 05 Sep 2009
Posts: 8707
An interesting crusade. I can't get my head round it at the moment but it seems a bit one sided to me.

What about the escorts/Wgs who do BB on the sly? I think we all know very well that those who openly advertise it are the tip of the iceberg. I've not checked, but there's probably only about 5 or 10 WGs in the whole of Brighton & East Sussex who advertise BB. And several times that number who offer it behind closed doors!

Punters don't offer or advertise anything, they are the customers. They just try their luck, ask for things, offer extra £££, try to blag things, don't they?

So, is it right to demonise the men who want a bareback service but to protect the privacy of the WGs who provide it :scratch:

Looking at the Poll at the top of this section - out of 170 votes, 58% of gents say they have been OFFERED bareback by a Sussex WG in the last 5 years. That's a majority of punters.

I'm sitting on the fence.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 10:47 pm 
coastman wrote:
An interesting crusade. I can't get my head round it at the moment but it seems a bit one sided to me.

What about the escorts/Wgs who do BB on the sly? I think we all know very well that those who openly advertise it are the tip of the iceberg. I've not checked, but there's probably only about 5 or 10 WGs in the whole of Brighton & East Sussex who advertise BB. And several times that number who offer it behind closed doors!

Punters don't offer or advertise anything, they are the customers. They just try their luck, ask for things, offer extra £££, try to blag things, don't they?

So, is it right to demonise the men who want a bareback service but to protect the privacy of the WGs who provide it :scratch:

Looking at the Poll at the top of this section - out of 170 votes, 58% of gents say they have been OFFERED bareback by a Sussex WG in the last 5 years. That's a majority of punters.

I'm sitting on the fence.
Punters that have been offered bareback on the 'sly' by escorts that dont openly advertise it,have option to name and shame them in aw feedback,field report,or here on sussexscene. there is increase of punters who ask for this service ,offer extra money even after hearing a clear 'No',or worse go into abusive verbal/text/e-mail attack ,and still contact escorts who neither advertise neither provide this service,so only fair to EQUALY name and shame. and only fair they have a page dedicated to weed them out. makes it safer for escorts and in long run to other punters . you do not see barebacker escorts section as them being demonised,so you shouldnt see it as punters being demonised. it's only fair information exchange. also looking at that poll 30% (and thats only from sussexscene members,so how many in reality through out AW and friday ad are out there?)thats almost shockingly one third!!! admit they would accept it if offered by working girl. that poll was done some time ago,and where's guarantee that those 30% have not asked for it themselves in the first instance? Coastman,can you budge and give me some room on that fence,I'll sit next to you.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 11:34 pm 
Platinum Elite Member
Platinum Elite Member

Joined: 05 Sep 2009
Posts: 8707
Fair comments.
I think some of us men don't say anything for fear of grief and reprisals. Perhaps if you want it, you say nothing and think you are the special one (not Jose Mourinho) and if you don't then you keep quiet for an easy life and go elsewhere next time.
It's quite hard when you are dealing with what happens in private between 2 people and wishing to respect somebody's privacy. Against that there is the very real health risk.
The last 2 times I have been offered BB it killed my passion and ruined my punts. I'm a bit paranoid about it now I'm older and wiser.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 11:36 pm 
thats the poll I was talking about viewtopic.php?f=75&t=1309


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 11:27 am 
Platinum Elite Member
Platinum Elite Member

Joined: 22 Oct 2009
Posts: 1449
Keira,

Having taken a look at your current AW profile (Great new pics - I may now be in love, rather than just the lust of before) I notice that whilst BB is not on your 'enjoys' list (and it is labelled as an enjoys list not a limits list) you don't actually say (as many girls do) that you don't do it (I think you did say no BB before so maybe that is the reason you are seeing an increase in requests?). So as it is perfectly legal I don't think it is right to publicly name and shame punters who ask you for it. Certainty naming on private lists amongst girls and parlours is fair enough. And aggressive repeated demands for anything after a polite denial are worthy of a punter name and shame thread.

It would be different if you (and like minded girls) stated something on your profile / ads such as

Quote:
I do NOT under any circumstances do bareback.
Any prospective client asking for bareback will be named on the internet with full details made public


But a punter just asking for something that is legal and isn't on your list and isn't referred to as 'no go' is IMHO reasonable.

For the avoidance of doubt, I find bareback sex (at least) 10 times nicer than covered sex, but I do NOT do it (or ask for it) with girls who have multiple partners. I also get tested annually.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 12:53 pm 
Mark881k wrote:
Keira,

Having taken a look at your current AW profile (Great new pics - I may now be in love, rather than just the lust of before) I notice that whilst BB is not on your 'enjoys' list (and it is labelled as an enjoys list not a limits list) you don't actually say (as many girls do) that you don't do it (I think you did say no BB before so maybe that is the reason you are seeing an increase in requests?). So as it is perfectly legal I don't think it is right to publicly name and shame punters who ask you for it. Certainty naming on private lists amongst girls and parlours is fair enough. And aggressive repeated demands for anything after a polite denial are worthy of a punter name and shame thread.

It would be different if you (and like minded girls) stated something on your profile / ads such as

Quote:
I do NOT under any circumstances do bareback.
Any prospective client asking for bareback will be named on the internet with full details made public


But a punter just asking for something that is legal and isn't on your list and isn't referred to as 'no go' is IMHO reasonable.

For the avoidance of doubt, I find bareback sex (at least) 10 times nicer than covered sex, but I do NOT do it (or ask for it) with girls who have multiple partners. I also get tested annually.

I do not have to write it on my profile as it is not on my enjoys list,means I do not offer it,but specially for you I will write with big capital letters,just in case the enjoys list is too small script to read!
girls that offer bareback on the sly,DO get named ,links to their profiles DO get provided even if they dont list it,but have offered and done on the sly.
they DO get exposed by field reports,reviews,comments on sussexscenethere's pages and pages of it on sussexscene and I think it's right,and people should be informed,same with punters!
I started this thread mainly for other ESCORTS to see,yes it can be seen by punters,so can be bareback girls section available to see for all,girls and punters alike!
WHAT IS YOUR PROBLEM with my attempt to erradicate the problem?! I use friday ad ,there are certain words they do not allow to be printed in the ad,so NO,this ONE page here is to stay,to make me and other escorts safe,don't like it,dont read it. I am not posting punters pictures,not even full number,just adult work name and few digits of phone number.
it is gonna be increasing problem as it proves ,even by sussexscene poll 30 percent would accept bareback if it was offered by WG, WG's get exposed,their names and other details provided,so No it's only fair that punters that offer it without girl giving a reason such as advertising it,get marked!!!!


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 12:57 pm 
you say punters are only asking for something that is legal,well girls that are ticking bareback box arent doing it against the law either. doesnt make either of parties less dangerous! so one rule for punters,another for working girls ,eh? time to peel your peepers open! you do not want to see girls that offer bareback,so them being in sussexscene bareback zone,makes life easier to filter your punting search. Selfrespecting escorts do not want to see punters that ask for bareback,so adding their adultwork name on blocked list them even opening the offending e-mail,or storing their number as barebacker 123 in their phone and putting it on automated reject list also helps,due to huge volume of calls especially over the period of time it is impossible otherwise to remember their number. All we want is to stay safe,I cannot physically private inbox each escort, that would leave me with no time to work! and some of them I dont even know. you warn other punters about escorts in bareback zone on Sscene for same reason- saves time and effortand makes it safer,so how comes escorts concerned about their wellfare dont have same rights????? or it causes such e vengence to fight from some members? I suppose it's those 30% that voted that would accept bareback if offered would oppose,but I wouldnt have thought mark was one of them,poll was annonymous,hey ho!
at the end of the day I am not posting real names,they can still hide under their Aw guise,punting phone,and even that is not published full,for crying out loud,what is the Problem?


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 2:10 pm 
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: 03 Jan 2014
Posts: 211
Seeing as I check on here for any scandal with regards BB before booking any escort I see, on the grounds of safety. I really can't blame any ladies wanting the option to do the same. Lets be honest would any of us want to be kissing someone that might have giving a known barebacker RO only hours or days before??
To be fair compared to some of the anti BB escort witch-hunts this and similar sites have seen in the past. I think Keira's approach is nothing but reasonable. Personally I would be happier to see some one that I know actively avoids punters that partake in BB elsewhere. I will admit that AW has lost alot of it's appeal to me as there are just so many ladies offering BB, and while many aren't - it is impossible to know which of the safer (smarter, less suicidal) ladies has seen some (maybe many) BB punters without knowing it. Kudos to Keira for trying to give the ladies more insight into who might be booking them.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 3:01 pm 
Platinum Elite Member
Platinum Elite Member

Joined: 22 Oct 2009
Posts: 1449
Sorry If my thoughts offended you, I was just trying to have a reasonable discussion.

Quote:
I do not have to write it on my profile as it is not on my enjoys list,means I do not offer it,



The point I was trying to make it that is not the way punters look at the enjoys list. I can understand that some/most girls view it as a limits list, but it isn't unless you say in your profile, "if it is not in my likes list I will not do it".

Quote:
but specially for you I will write with big capital letters,just in case the enjoys list is too small script to read!
girls that offer bareback on the sly,DO get named ,links to their profiles DO get provided even if they dont list it,but have offered and done on the sly.
they DO get exposed by field reports,reviews,comments on sussexscenethere's pages and pages of it on sussexscene and I think it's right,and people should be informed,same with punters!



And girls give feedback to punters to AW and can and do expose things. I don't have a problem with SS reviews of punters by escorts as long as personal details are not revealed.

Quote:
WHAT IS YOUR PROBLEM with my attempt to erradicate the problem?!



I don't have a problem with your attempt to stop punters asking you for BB, and I suggested a simple way to reduce the problem for you.

Quote:
I use friday ad ,there are certain words they do not allow to be printed in the ad,so NO,this ONE page here is to stay,to make me and other escorts safe,don't like it,dont read it. I am not posting punters pictures,not even full number,just adult work name and few digits of phone number.
it is gonna be increasing problem as it proves ,even by sussexscene poll 30 percent would accept bareback if it was offered by WG, WG's get exposed,their names and other details provided,so No it's only fair that punters that offer it without girl giving a reason such as advertising it,get marked!!!!

you say punters are only asking for something that is legal,well girls that are ticking bareback box arent doing it against the law either. doesnt make either of parties less dangerous! so one rule for punters,another for working girls ,eh? time to peel your peepers open! you do not want to see girls that offer bareback,so them being in sussexscene bareback zone,makes life easier to filter your punting search. Selfrespecting escorts do not want to see punters that ask for bareback,so adding their adultwork name on blocked list them even opening the offending e-mail,or storing their number as barebacker 123 in their phone and putting it on automated reject list also helps,due to huge volume of calls especially over the period of time it is impossible otherwise to remember their number. All we want is to stay safe,I cannot physically private inbox each escort, that would leave me with no time to work! and some of them I dont even know. you warn other punters about escorts in bareback zone on Sscene for same reason- saves time and effortand makes it safer,so how comes escorts concerned about their wellfare dont have same rights????? or it causes such e vengence to fight from some members? I suppose it's those 30% that voted that would accept bareback if offered would oppose,but I wouldnt have thought mark was one of them,poll was annonymous,hey ho!
at the end of the day I am not posting real names,they can still hide under their Aw guise,punting phone,and even that is not published full,for crying out loud,what is the Problem?


Some of us don't use a punting phone !
Maybe that is my problem (although I won't appear on your list)

(The OH finding a spare phone with texts from escorts would be a much bigger problem than if she found a stray message from an escort that was addressed to a name that wasn't mine).

Again, sorry if my thoughts offended.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 3:03 pm 
my latest profile update:Frequently Asked Questions...
Q. Do you do bareback? A. very firm NO! DONT even ask,as if you do,I will not accept booking from you and will share your adultwork details with other escorts and any punting related social media for health safety purposes to safeguard other members of public from your unsafe sexual preferences


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 3:07 pm 
Platinum Elite Member
Platinum Elite Member

Joined: 22 Oct 2009
Posts: 1449
annabelledelight wrote:
It's certainly starting to become a problem! It was rare that I would be asked for it and I think prior to approx 8 months ago I had only ever had one person ask. I've not had anyone from AW ask me, however the Friday-ad lots when I had my last ad up so I'm having a mini break from advertising via that medium.

Will message you for the full number, thanks honey XXX


You do clearly state in your AW profile that all activities are protected which is probably why you have never had anyone from AW ask for it.
A simple solution.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 96 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UK Punting Time


ONLINE NOW!

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  


For all enquiries concerning SussexScene.com, you can contact the Webmaster at webmaster@sussexscene.com

© 2009-2016 SussexScene.com | Template design by SussexScene | Cookie & Privacy Policy